| Most Cited Articles: Molecular and Cellular Biosciences |
|
|
|
|
The following article citations represent the 20 most cited papers related to ethics in molecular and cellular biology in the Scopus database. The list presents articles in descending order by the number of times each article has been cited. If you would like information about the search terms and method used to determine this list, please e-mail mohayes2[at]illinois.edu. Gillies, P.J. (2003). Nutrigenomics: The Rubicon of molecular nutrition. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(12 suppl.), 50-55. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.037 Koella, J.C. (2000). The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267(1456), 1979-1985. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1239 Fadiel, A.; Anidi, I. & Eichenbaum, K.D. (2005). Farm animal genomics and informatics: An update. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(19), 6308-6318. doi:10.1093/nar/gki931 Verhoog, H. (1992). The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 5&340;2), 147-160. doi:10.1007/BF01966357 Mayr, E. (2000). Darwin's influence on modern thought. Scientific American, 283(1), 78-83. Bracke, M.B.M.; Spruijt, B.M. & Metz, J.H.M. (1999). Overall animal welfare assessment reviewed. Part 1: Is it possible? Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 47(3-4), 279-291. Winston, R.M.L. & Handyside, A.H. (1993). New challenges in human in vitro fertilization. Science, 260(5110), 932-936. Martin, G.B. & Kadokawa, H. (2006). "Clean, green and ethical" animal production. Case study: Reproductive efficiency in small ruminants. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 52(1), 145-152. doi:10.1262/jrd.17086-2 Pera, M.F. (2001). Scientific considerations relating to the ethics of the use of human embryonic stem cells in research and medicine. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 13(1), 23-29. doi:10.1071/RD00077 Nevalainen, T., et al. (2000). FELASA recommendations for the education and training of persons carrying out animal experiments (Category B). Laboratory Animals, 34(2), 229-235. doi:10.1258/002367700780384672 Hayes, W.M. & Lynne, G.D. (2004). Towards a centerpiece for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 49(3), 287-301. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.014 Hall, S.G. & Lima, M. (2001). Problem-solving approaches and philosophies in biological engineering: Challenges from technical, social, and ethical arenas. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 44(4), 1037-1041. McKay, C.P. & Marinova, M.M. (2001). The physics, biology, and environmental ethics of making Mars habitable. Astrobiology, 1(1), 89-109. doi:10.1089/153110701750137477 Scully, J.L. & Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2001). When norms normalize: The case of genetic "enhancement". Human Gene Therapy, 12(1), 87-95. doi:10.1089/104303401451004 Khushf, G. (2004). Systems theory and the ethics of human enhancement: A framework for NBIC convergence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013, 124-149. doi:10.1196/annals.1305.007 Appleby, M.C. (1999). Tower of Babel: Variation in ethical approaches, concepts of welfare and attitudes to genetic manipulation. Animal Welfare, 8(4), 381-390. Arking, R. (2004). Commentary/Meeting Report: A new age for aging? Ethical questions, scientific insights, and societal outcomes. Rejuvenation Research, 7(1), 53-60. doi:10.1089/154916804323105099 Kitcher, P. (2004). Responsible biology. BioScience, 54(4), 331-336. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[5B0331:RB]5D2.0.CO; Kass, L.R. (1971). The new biology: What price relieving man's estate? Science, 174(4011), 779-788. Deplazes, A. & Huppenbauer, M. (2009). Synthetic organisms and living machines: Positioning the products of synthetic biology at the borderline between living and non-living matter. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 3(1), 55-63. doi:10.1007/s11693-009-9029-4 |
| Last Updated on Friday, 17 February 2012 20:13 |





Supported by the